Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khaled El-Khweldi El-Hamedi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:06, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Khaled El-Khweldi El-Hamedi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable per WP:BIO (previously deleted and re-created at least 4 times) Antipastor (talk) 11:56, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This was previously A7 speedy deleted, but not sure if same version exactly. I am putting it here because of many recreations just to avoid repeated independent deletions. I think it can be deleted per WP:BIO. Antipastor (talk) 12:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unreferenced, no independent indication of notability as required by WP:BIO. WWGB (talk) 12:40, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This article has been recreated under multiple titles by multiple SPAs in the last 24 hours and is starting to feel to me like "Whack-A-Mole". All versions seem superficially identical, all seem to have no reliable sources and my brief investigation of some of the claims didn't find any meaningful corroboration. It is perhaps unnecessary to mention that people don't inherit notability from their parents. A complete AfD will help with speedying what are likely to be many subsequent versions. Accounting4Taste:talk 14:39, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable. I also see several users that need bannination. Hairhorn (talk) 18:15, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This article has significant coverage of the subject (from "Email a raffica" to the end), but I can't find anything else other than this, which confirms one of the subject's positions. But, then again, I can't read Arabic. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Interesting, although I can't read Italian to say for sure. I'm rethinking the notability part from start (no opinion for now), trying to see objectively despite the disruptive editing. Found this [[1]] too (needless to say that the article remains highly problematic, but could be fixable after all). Antipastor (talk) 12:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- And as a note, searching for "Khaled El Hamedi" instead of the article's title seems to yield results. Antipastor (talk) 12:45, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Enough claims are verifiable. However, not convinced regarding notability (excluding Arabic sources too, but based on the English translation of the espresso Italian article found here [[2]] under the title "Double-Cross"). Antipastor (talk) 13:18, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.